🔗 Share this article

Europe breathed a deep collective sigh of relief on Monday, as the diplomatic emergency triggered by the presentation of a new 28-point plan for ending the war appeared – momentarily – to have been stabilised. A senior US official spoke of "significant advancement" after bilateral negotiations in Geneva. On Monday night, Russian leadership made its countermove: a renewed assault of missile and drone strikes on Kyiv.

The Pattern of Diplomacy and Destruction

The chain of contrasting events captured the grim essence of the recent timeframe. By day, negotiation efforts are conducted: hopeful statements are delivered from various governments. Considerable effort is devoted on managing specific proposals. By night, the Kremlin clearly shows the world that, for them, war remains the primary tool for achieving "settlement".

Nocturnal Warfare

As military strikes developed into the early hours of Tuesday, the current condition of Ukraine's exposure was revealed. Ukraine is equipped to monitor rocket firings from across the border, a capacity afforded by up-to-date information. From observation points, defense planes that had been dispatched to counter approaching guided weapons flew past – advanced fighter aircraft delivered to Ukraine by Western partners.

Shortly after, Kyiv's anti-aircraft weapons activated: multiple launches deployed against a hostile projectile. This was a modern interception technology at work, presumably supplied through allied countries. Every deployment shakes the surroundings, causing tremors. The moment of terror quickly gives way to grim resignation: perhaps the approaching threat won't strike its target this time, sparing the city from devastation and another blackout.

Ongoing Risks

Following this, a large-caliber weapon opened up on a unmanned aircraft in the vicinity, part of a defensive team – most likely Western-made equipment. Unfortunately, the bullets missed the hostile drone – it continued its flight toward its target.

Periodically, this carried on until dawn. Kyiv greeted the daybreak reports: seven people killed, damage and utility failures in numerous residences as a result of the nocturnal offensive. As always, everyone still maintained normal activities – enduring hostilities. But those entire period demonstrated Ukraine's vital need on external assistance – a dependence that regional partners are demonstrably unable to fill in the immediate future.

Ineffective Peace Efforts

The detailed framework from American leadership provoked deep reactions, controversy and serious worry – and temporarily diverted attention from Ukraine's major integrity crisis in years. Yet, we have witnessed similar scenarios, after earlier high-level meetings and multilateral gatherings.

Every new approach from American administration follows the identical sequence: a diplomatic cavalry charge against Ukraine, which Kyiv, with allied governments, effectively counters. They manage the tension but never actually win the battle. This pattern will, certainly, endure.

Tactical Assessments

It is convenient to criticize specific actors of consistently pushing Russian terms. But that does not seem to be the whole story. Washington operates on a assumption understood by international relations experts: you cannot achieve through diplomacy what you have been unable to protect through force. The White House presumes that it is impossible to force Russia to relinquish the land that it presently holds in Ukraine's occupied territories.

The problem is that while recognising this factual reality, US leadership does minimal to discourage Russia, through diplomacy or military means, from believing that the current condition will not change more in its advantage in the coming year.

Conflicting Perspectives

Therefore, the Kremlin is convinced that the clock favors them – that Ukraine and its supporters are nearing depletion. Their reason to sign a deal that does not give them the maximum possible gain is close to zero. There may be numerous efforts to stop fighting, but they will continue as long as Russia's leadership remains completely certain in the result.

On the contrary, Ukraine's government believes that Ukraine can still endure, slowly losing civilians and areas but averting a entire defensive failure until situations evolve in its benefit.

Present Conditions

Realistically, there are no real preconditions for a ceasefire. Now, subjective factors are coming into play: political desires to negotiate peace and obtain worldwide acknowledgment, and Ukrainian leadership's double obstacles – on one hand, not to distance important partners, and on the other, to mobilize citizens around the flag against any plan Kyiv finds unacceptable, so that their priority does not switch to domestic problems. And although their task will now be considerably more difficult after current events, it remains highly unlikely that this will change their overall approach.

These conflicting dynamics are guiding negotiations.

Summary and Prospects

It took a mere seven days to kill the suggested clauses of the most recent proposal. Aggressive and erratic handling of the matter by Washington, opposition by Ukraine and the other European countries, along with soothing efforts of diplomats, and finally, current information leaks, all achieved their purpose.

While new proposals based on old ideas are imminent, Kyiv, London and other Western governments should draw one fundamental conclusion: Ukraine and Europe will only be able to fend off negotiation assaults from Washington that are founded on Moscow's terms and reflect specific hesitation to modify developments, if they stand together and improve their protective measures at a significantly accelerated rate. If they do, neither external pressure nor military threats will be able to break them. In the meantime, Ukraine's capacity to counter nocturnal attacks will, for the foreseeable future, largely rely on sustained allied backing.